Legal Opinion

Beauregard v. Automobile Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1924No. 18610PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Respondent, as plaintiff, brought this action to recover upon a policy of insurance against fire and theft, issued by the defendant upon an automobile. The defense was based upon the theory of fraud and misrepresentation in the procuring of the policy. Trial was to the court sitting without a jury, resulting in findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $500, together with interest and costs. From this judgment, the defendant has appealed.

The respondent in his brief presents his motion to the effect that the statement of facts be stricken; that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clifford v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Fender v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Poor v. CudiheeWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Beeler v. BarrWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Halferty v. SchmidtWashington Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eichler v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API