Legal Opinion

Seattle Automobile Co. v. Stimson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1912No. 9690PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Prigmore, J., entered April 21, 1911, upon findings favorable to the defendant, in an action on account, after a trial before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This is a suit to recover the balance due upon an account for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to *549defendant. The alleged balance due is $1,013.95. A judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for $33.50, and it has appealed.

It is admitted that, between the 9th day of January, 1907, and the 19th day of August, 1908, the appellant sold and delivered to the respondent automobiles and automobile supplies of the value of $16,574.15 and that the respondent paid thereon $15,500.20. The contention of the respondent is that his obligation to pay the balance of the account in excess of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nunez v. DautelSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Noland v. BullOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Crooker v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1875
  4. Williston v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Randall v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1881

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Frye & BruhnWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Beeler v. BarrWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Scott v. Union Machinery & Supply Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Granite Falls State Bank v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API