Legal Opinion

Everest v. Riecken

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1946No. 29983PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

Appellants, Egbert E. Everest and Gladys Everest as a marital community, and Egbert E. Everest as guardian ad litem for his minor son, Jack Everest, brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained by him in a collision between a bicycle ridden by him and an automobile owned by respondents as a family car, and driven by their minor son, James F. Riecken.

The cause was tried to the court sitting with a jury, but was dismissed at the close of respondents’ case upon a motion for a directed verdict. Appellants assign as error (1) dismissal of the action upon respondents’ motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Johnson v. J. C. HeitmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Mathers v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc. v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Coerver v. HaabWashington Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. JudgeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Everest v. RieckenWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Bonica v. GraciasWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. MeekinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API