Legal Opinion

Mathers v. Stephens

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1945No. 29421PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

The appellants, Ray Mathers and wife, brought this action against the respondents, W. T. Stephens and wife, to recover damages for injuries to person and property arising out of a collision of their respective automobiles. In this opinion the respective husbands will be referred to as though they were the only parties to the action.

The theory of the complaint was that, as the appellant was driving his automobile along the right-hand side of an arterial highway, the respondent, who was driving his automobile along a county road which intersected the arterial highway diagonally, negligently…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Omeitt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Schofield v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. West Coast Transport Co. v. LandinWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Greater Motors Corp. v. Metropolitan Taxi Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Young v. Caravan CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Graham v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API