Legal Opinion

Schenkl v. Dana

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 3, 1875PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

The plaintiff, as administratrix of her husband, brings this bill against the defendant, as surviving partner, for a settlement of the partnership accounts of Schenkl & Dana. Both parties appeal from the decree which was ordered at the hearing before a single judge. The case comes up on his report with a statement of his findings upon the evidence, which is all reported. Only two questions are now in controversy.

1. The defendant contends that he is entitled to share the profits on time fuzes manufactured by the plaintiff’s intestate during the life of the partnership and prior to a settlement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ames v. DowningNew York Surrogate's Court · 1850
  2. Schunack v. Art Metal Novelty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  3. Lyman v. LymanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1829

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Moore v. RawsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Dunlap v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Wiggins v. BrandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Taber v. BreckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  5. Roth v. BoiesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API