Ames v. Downing
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
The Subbogate.
This case, though long pending in this Court, presents no complicated questions of fact. Die immense amount of testimony taken, and the protracted proceedings before the auditors, were in the main unnecessary ; and indeed it is difficult to imagine any reason why an accounting which might have been argued before the Surrogate, at the farthest, in the course of a few weeks, should thus have dragged its slow length along for four years before being brought to argument.
The points of controversy between the parties, are three in number.
1st. Mr. Ames, husband of one of the daughters…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Olcott v. . Tioga Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of SilkmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Evans v. GalardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Kittredge v. LangleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Schenkl v. DanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.