Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Watson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 25, 1878PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Bill in equity, inserted in an original writ of summons and attachment, dated November 4, 1869, for the settlement of the affairs of a partnership. Hearing upon the pleadings, a master’s report and the defendant’s exceptions thereto, before Lord, J., who reserved the case for the consideration of the full court. The material facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

The defendant excepts to the master’s report, because he disallowed his claim for services rendered both before the formation of the partnership, and after its termination.

The plaintiff and defendant were carpenters. The master finds that a copartnership was formed between them in 1855, for the purpose of erecting certain buildings for a corporation, and continued until the work was finished in 1856; that by the terms of the agreement, (there being no written articles of copartnérship,) each was to devote his whole time and labor to the business of the firm and pay his own personal expenses,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schenkl v. DanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Shulkin v. ShulkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Ball v. HopkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Moore v. RawsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Forbes v. WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. Freeman v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API