Legal Opinion

Lasky v. Paprocki Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1949No. Appeal, 202PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the decree of the court below dismissing exceptions to the Chancellor’s findings of fact and dismissing the bill of complaint.

The appellant filed a bill in equity for the cancellation of a deed purported to be executed by Waclaw Paprocki, father of the appellant, during his lifetime, which conveyed to his son, Walter Paprocki, and the latter’s wife, Cora Paprocki, certain real estate in the Borough of Arnold, Westmoreland County. The consideration set forth was $3200.00. Waclaw Paprocki died on April 25, 1948. Five days later the above deed was recorded in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Teats v. Anderson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Rosenthal's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. White v. Chester Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Estate of ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Monongahela Trust Co. v. KazimerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Girsh TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Hagopian v. EskandarianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Pochron WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Elias WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Obici v. Third National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API