Estate of Coleman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 395, Jan. T., 1898, by-Louise Ybanez Anduaga, widow of George Dawson Coleman, deceased, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., July T., 1879, No. 245, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. See also Coleman’s Appeal, 185 Pa. 437. Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to adjudication.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Dean,
In 1878, Robert Coleman, of Philadelphia, died in Paris, where he had resided for some years. He left surviving him, a widow, Rosalie Parant Coleman, a native of France, and one son, George Dawson Coleman, born October 15, 1862. He died testate, his will having been executed in Paris and bearing date July 23,1878. While he had some property in France, the bulk of his estate was in Pennsylvania, consisting principally of an interest in the Cornwall ore banks in Lebanon *608county; this interest yielding an annul income of about $100,000. The will gave to the widow, as…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Greenfield' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
- Yardley v. CuthbertsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Darlington's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
- Darlington's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Whitridge v. WhitridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shook v. Bergstrasser Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Weber v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Smith v. KeenerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Lasky v. Paprocki Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Roecher v. StoryMontana Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.