Legal Opinion

White v. Chester Municipal Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1944No. Appeals, 32, 33 and 35PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This was a taxpayer’s bill, filed March 27, 1941, to set aside transactions by which Chester Municipal Authority, on December 8, 1939, acquired the water works, etc., which since then haye supplied water to the City of Chester. The hill charged that defendants conspired to defraud the city into paying an excessive price for the property. Responsive answers were filed. A long trial followed. The learned chancellor, President Judge Shull, 1 after an extended examination of the evidence, found that there was no conspiracy to defraud. The finding, affirmed in banc, is amply supported…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Leedom v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. McCown v. FraserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Null's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Lochinger v. HanlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parker v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Mistick v. CammackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Lasky v. Paprocki Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Truscott v. Yiddisher Kultur FarbandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. JOHNSON v. DewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API