Legal Opinion
In Re White
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 18, 2008No. F054327PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOMES, J.
— On the premise that his trial attorney’s failure to raise statute of limitations issues constituted ineffective assistance of counsel leading to his prosecution for and conviction of time-barred crimes, Adrian Joe White petitions for a writ of habeas corpus and prays for reversal of the judgment and dismissal with prejudice. We will deny the petition.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 21, 2005, the district attorney filed an information charging White with commission of one count each of forcible rape (Pen. Code, former § 261, subd. (a)(2)) 1 and forcible oral copulation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Steamship Co. v. JoliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Sekt v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Perkins Manufacturing Co. v. Clinton Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. HollieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Birotte v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- (HC) Iturralde v. AtchleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Birotte v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.