Legal Opinion

Billups v. Utah Canal Enlargement & Extension Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1901No. Civil No. 710PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District inland for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDoan, J.

The appellant, as plaintiff, brought an action in the. district court of Maricopa County against the appellee, as defendant, to recover damage for the injury caused to plaintiff’s (appellant’s) land, crops, and stock by the breaking of the canal owned and operated by the appellee, and the consequent flooding of the plaintiff’s premises. The complaint alleged that "the defendant, while operating and *213carrying water in the said canal, grossly neglected to keep the banks of said canal in proper repair to carry water therein, and did manage said canal and water therein in such a grossly careless…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. BarnhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Carpenter v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Frost v. Grizzly Bluff Creamery Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Nelson v. LemmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arizona Land & Stock Co. v. MarkusArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. McCarty v. FC Kingston CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  3. Puterbaugh v. Gila CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Miller v. MadduxArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Deisler v. StevensArizona Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API