Legal Opinion

Frost v. Grizzly Bluff Creamery Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1894No. 15436PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This is an action to recover damages for a nuisance. The jury returned a verdict in the sum of four hundred dollars, for which amount judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Defendant (a corporation) appeals from the judgment, and brings up the judgment-roll, and a bill of exceptions which merely shows the instructions given and refused, and the exceptions thereto. Nothing else appears. A reversal is asked solely upon alleged errors in giving and refusing instructions.

In such a case a judgment will rarely be reversed. All intendments are in favor of sustaining it. If the averments in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Miller v. LittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Carpenter v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. White v. Abernathy, Clark & Co.California Supreme Court · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCarty v. FC Kingston CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  2. Morrison v. PierceIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Deisler v. StevensArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Billups v. Utah Canal Enlargement & Extension Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Bryant v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API