Puterbaugh v. Gila County
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.
Gila county, a municipal corporation, through its county attorney, Rouland W. Hill, brought suit against Carl N. Puterbaugh and his bondsman, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, under the provisions of sections 790 and 791, Revised Code 1928, to recover certain sums which it was alleged defendant Puterbaugh had, as a member of the board of supervisors of Gila county, ordered paid out of the county treasury without authority of law. Similar suits were filed against Mark Hicks and Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, his bondsman, and Burton A. Guynup and the American Employers…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hallowell v. CommonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Railroad Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- State ex rel. Bulkeley v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- McSurely v. McGrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Austin v. BarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Fund Manager v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Maricopa Cty. v. Cities & Towns of Avondale, Etc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Gold v. KilleenArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Pima County v. AnklamArizona Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.