Legal Opinion

Martin v. Walker

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 7,284PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the defendant in the Twenty-second District Court, County of Marin. Temple, J. A petition for hearing in Bank in this case was filed after judgment, and denied.

1Opinion of the Court

Morrison, C. J.:

Plaintiffs brought their suit in the late District Court of Marin County, for the partition of certain lands situate in said county. The complaint contains the averment that the plaintiffs are the owners, seized in fee, are tenants in common, and are in possession of said lands with defendants. The defendants in their separate answers deny that plaintiffs, or *592either of them, are the owners of any interest in the lands sought to be divided, and claim ownership thereof in their own right, adversely to plaintiffs. The case comes before us on the complaint, answers, findings, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morenhout v. HigueraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. De Uprey v. De UpreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Weston v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Jameson v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hill v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Denton v. FyfeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Buhrmeister v. BuhrmeisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API