Buhrmeister v. Buhrmeister
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an interlocutory judgment in partition in the Superior Court of Solano County. L. G. Harrier, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was for partition, and the appeal is from the interlocutory judgment.
The only point urged hy appellant is that the action was prematurely brought. On February 18, 1903, H. G. Buhrmeister died testate, devising in equal shares the property sought to be partitioned to his six children, including appellant and respondent. By the terms of the will, as stated by appellant, plaintiff was given the use and occupation, rents, issues and profits of said property for five years immediately after the death of the testator at the annual rental of $300, $60 to be paid to each of the other five…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Watson v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Martin v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Chapin v. SearsUnited States Circuit Court · 1883
3Cited by9 opinions
- Western Reciprocal Underwriters' Exchange v. CoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Carolina Mineral Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Priddel v. ShankieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Schlueter v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Powers v. PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.