Legal Opinion
Aramide Maatschappij V.o.F. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 18, 1995No. Court No. 94-07-00424PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Restani, Judge:
This matter is before the court on a motion for judgment upon the agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2. The motion has been brought by Aramid Products Vo.F. (formerly Aramide Maats-chappij Vo.F.) and Akzo Nobel Fibers Inc. (formerly Akzo Fibers Inc.) (collectively “Aramide”), challenging the determination of the International Trade Administration of the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) in Aramid Fiber Formed of Poly-Phenylene [sic] Terephthalamide from the Netherlands, 59 Fed. Reg. 23,684 (Dep’t Comm. 1994) (final determ, of LTFV sales) (‘Final Det.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bookman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Budd Co., Wheel & Brake Division v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Ppg Industries, Inc. v. United States, Vitro Flotado, S.A. And Vidrio Plano De Mexico, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- American Signature, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Shandong Huarong General Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Consolidated Bearings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Shakeproof Assembly Components Division of Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.