Hametic Lodge Building Ass'n v. Esters
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
This matter arose upon application for a receiver without notice. The verified complaint constituted the evidence given on the hearing, and at the conclusion the court appointed a receiver.
The appellee claims that the appeal is from the overruling of the motion to set aside and that no question is presented. However, the record does not seem to support the contention of the appellee.
The cause was filed and the receiver was appointed on the same day. Part of the defendants were served with summons on the date of the filing and part were served on the following day. A special appearance was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Henderson v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Kent Avenue Grocery Co. v. George Hitz & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Hizer v. HizerIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
- Morris v. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
- Tormohlen v. TormohlenIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Fatzer v. MolitorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- ROTAN v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Meyering v. Petroleum Holdings, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1949