Legal Opinion

Morris v. Nixon

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1945No. 28,120PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStarr, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order, appointing a receiver without notice. Appellee filed her verified complaint in the court below which prayed for the appointment of a receiver without notice, and on the date that the cause was commenced, such receiver was so appointed.

By a proper assignment of error, appellants call in question the action of the trial court in making the appointment of the receiver in the absence of notice of such appointment.

Section 3-2602, Burns’ 1933, provides as follows:

“Receivers shall not be appointed, either in term or vacation, in any case, until the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hawkins v. AldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Tucker v. TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Mannos v. Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Kent Avenue Grocery Co. v. George Hitz & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Red Dragon Diner, Inc. v. Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Fagan, Etc. v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Industrial MacHinery Co., Inc. v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Second Real Estate Investments, Inc. v. JohannIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Johann & Sons Co. v. BergesIndiana Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API