Legal Opinion

Meyering v. Petroleum Holdings, Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1949No. 28,499PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Appellant, in the first sentence of “Argument” in his brief, says, “This appeal raises the single question as to whether or not the trial court erred in appointing a receiver in this cause without notice to the defendants, including the appellant.”

The appellant, Lawrence V. Meyering, and the appellees, Higgins, Remien and Camfield, are the owners of a half interest in four certain oil and gas leases, covering real estate in Pike County, Indiana. These parties are all residents of the State of Michigan and their interests are alike, except as to the proportion held by each, and they will be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hawkins v. AldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Continental Clay & Mining Co. v. BrysonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Kent Avenue Grocery Co. v. George Hitz & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hizer v. HizerIndiana Supreme Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johann & Sons Co. v. BergesIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. ROTAN v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API