Legal Opinion
State v. Oevering
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 23, 1978No. 46836PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
This case arises out of a head-on collision between two motor vehicles. Following the accident, Steven J. Oevering, the alleged driver of one of the vehicles, was charged with criminal negligence and several other offenses. Over Oevering’s objection, the trial court admitted the blood-alcohol analysis of a blood sample taken from him without his consent in the hospital emergency room. The jury found Oevering guilty as charged. On appeal, Oevering challenges the admission of the blood-alcohol test and the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction. We affirm.
On the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Aliff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Ashley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.