Holmes v. Dunning
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, C.J.
In this case the appellants were defendants in the court below and decree pro eonfesso was properly ■entered against each of them in a suit to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of a certain promissory note. The note was dated St. Petersburg, Florida, May 28, 1926, was for the sum of $1100.00, payable one year after ■date to the order of “Ora Snow Estate”. The mortgage was of the same date and named “Ora Snow Estate” as the mortgagee. Jessie Hay was the mortgagor and the maker of the note.
The appeal is from final decree in favor of the complainant who was assignee of the note…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bensimer v. FellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wood v. Holly Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Brett v. First National Bank of MariannaSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Dulaney v. WillisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Peers v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bacher v. City Nat. Bk., Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Richardson v. South Florida Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Hobco, Inc. v. Tallahassee AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Atlantic Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Fort Lauderdale v. Kitimat Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Bishop, Et Vir v. Orange Belt Securities Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.