Legal Opinion

Dulaney v. Willis

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 10, 1898PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a decree of tlie Chancery Court of the city of Richmond iu a suit iu chancery instituted by the appellees, Rrancis T. Allen and Otway S. Allen, suing on behalf of themselves and other creditors of James Alfred Jones, against the devisees and legatees of said Jones, the appellant, and others, for the purpose of having the estate of said Jones administered under the order of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

On the 4th day of July, 1893, James Alfred Jones, of the first part, signed, sealed, and delivered to H H. Dulaney, of the third part, a deed conveying to-, as trustee of the second part, certain lands therein described in trust to secure said Dulaney against loss from endorsements theretofore made, and thereafter to be made by him on certain notes of the said Jones.

The grantor died in February, 1894, insolvent, and Dulaney has had to pay a large sum as endorser of the notes mentioned in the deed.

The general creditors of deceased contest the right of appellant to a specific hen upon the lands…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCandlish v. KeenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1857
  2. McQuie v. PeaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Ruffners v. PutneySupreme Court of Virginia · 1855

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Alabama-Florida Co. v. MaysSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Chesapeake Shoe Co. v. SeldnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1903
  3. In re Williamsburg Knitting MillDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1911
  4. Gilbert v. PeppersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Janney v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API