Brett v. First National Bank of Marianna
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
Giblin, Circuit Judge.
The sole question presented by this appeal, which is from a final decree in a suit for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage lien, is whether the chancellor below erred in decreeing that the complainant (appellee) should recover from the defendant (appellant) the sum of $500 as solicitors’ fees for the services of the complainant’s solicitors in the suit, the chancellor having determine such sum to be reasonable.
The involved mortgage deed contained a stipulation under which reasonable solicitors’ fees were recoverable.
In view of the conclusion we have reached, we are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States Savings Bank v. PittmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Jevne & Almini v. OsgoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- White v. LucasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mallard v. EwingSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Brite, Et Vir v. Orange Belt Securities Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Trustees of Cameron-Brown v. TavorminaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Mullan v. Bk. of Pasco Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Jaudon v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.