Legal Opinion

Song v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 10, 1999No. 98-646CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

This case comes before the court on the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, both based upon a review of the administrative record. Carole Seno Song first submitted her petition for redress under the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, 50 U.S.C. app. §§ 1989-1989b-9. (1988 & Supp. V 1993), in August, 1995. On June 23, 1997, defendant, through the Office of Redress Administration of the United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, denied Ms. Song’s claim, relying on their interpretation of the regulations…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carol Judy Higashi v. United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Murakami v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Murakami v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Higashi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Jarvis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API