Legal Opinion

Higashi v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 7, 1999No. 98-639CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This Japanese internment case comes before the Court on the plaintiffs and the defendant’s cross-motions for summary judgment, pursuant to United States Court of Federal Claims Rule (“RCFC”) 56. The plaintiff contends that the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 entitles her to' redress payment and an apology as the result of the Federal Government excluding her from her parents’ original place of residence, Sacramento, California, during World War II. For the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s motion is granted, the plaintiff’s motion is denied, and the plaintiffs Complaint…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carol Judy Higashi v. United States, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API