Legal Opinion

City of Brook Park v. Necak

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1986No. 50177PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, P.J.

The defendant, Stevan Necak, appeals from an order which increased his sentence after he had partially satisfied the court’s original sentence. We agree that the court lacked authority to make that modification, so we reverse and reinstate the court’s original sentence.

On January 28,1985, defendant pled guilty to violating a municipal ordinance against driving under the influence of alcohol. The court found him guilty and requested a presentence investigation. Eighteen days later, after receiving the presentence report, the court sentenced him to thirty days in jail, a $225 fine, and costs.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. LongoOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hansen v. ReedOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. GarretsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. PurnellOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. CozzoneOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Cleveland v. RudolphOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API