Legal Opinion
MacHulsky v. Hall
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 9, 2002No. Civil Action 01-4444(SSB)PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12, are three Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Steven Leibrandt a/k/a busterlye (“Leibrandt”), Norman Knaak a/k/a bidoveru, and David Hall a/k/a score 900 (“Hall”) (collectively “Defendants”). Mary Machulsky,. Esquire, (“Plaintiff’ or “Machulsky”) has filed opposition to all of the above Motions.
For the reasons stated in this Opinion, the Court grants the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants solely on the basis that the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over them,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Toys "R" Us, Inc. Geoffrey, Inc. v. Step Two, S.A. Imaginarium Net, S.LCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Edwards v. SchwartzDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019
- AMERIPAY, LLC v. Ameripay Payroll, Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Seltzer v. I.C. Optics, Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Rupert v. BondDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.