Legal Opinion

Soifer Et Ux. v. Stein Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1930No. Appeal 143PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This appeal is from a mandatory injunction requiring the removal of a garage wall built by defendants on plaintiffs’ land in the City of Chester.

The encroachment is 20 feet long, 8 inches wide at one end and about 17 inches at the other; it is part of a one story brick garage, 20 feet by 18 feet, built on concrete foundations, which defendants erroneously thought they were building wholly on their own lot. Early in the trial it appeared that their position was that plaintiffs has “misled” defendants by planting a hedge on the boundary line. In the answer, the averment was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wright v. BarberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. McGrann v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Orne v. FridenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Piper v. QueeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Hohl v. ModellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilbur's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Kern v. GreensweigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. BARNDOLLAR Et Ux. v. GroszkiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Ochroch v. Kia-NourySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Reynolds v. Wilson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API