Legal Opinion

Wilbur's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1938No. Appeals, 165, 166PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The ultimate disposition of these appeals depends on whether the record contains facts that support (1) the order charging the two trust estates with the fees of counsel for the exceptant, and (2) the payment of auditor’s fees in the amounts awarded. We all agree that the evidence shows clearly that the cases are not within the rule permitting the award of counsel fees and also that, in the circumstances disclosed, the learned court erred in not reducing the auditor’s fees.

The only exceptant to the accounts is Mrs. Hazzard, beneficiary under the will of Ray Wilbur,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hempstead v. Meadville Theological SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Crawford's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Lyon v. AlexamderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Curran's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. In Re Estate of LuxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Thompson WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Musser's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Funk EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API