Legal Opinion

Hall v. Proctor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1922No. Docket No. 43PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sharpe, J..Plaintiffs sue to recover damages on their rescission of a contract for the purchase of real estate in Ottawa county. They had verdict and judgment in the trial court. Defendants’ motion for a. new trial was overruled. Error is assigned upon the charge of the court and the denial of such motion. Plaintiffs, former residents of Nebraska, came to Grand Haven in December, 1919. The defendant Proctor was engaged in selling real estate on commission. The defendant VandenAkker listed a 40-acre farm with him in January, 1920, to be sold, with certain stock and farming tools thereon, for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Foster v. RinzMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Stevens v. WakemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Randolph v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Title & Trust Co. v. JasterMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. McConville v. Remington Rand, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Annett v. StoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In Re Astolas' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. People v. OmachtMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API