McConville v. Remington Rand, Inc.

Plaintiff’s claim for commissions, said to have been earned by him in selling defend ant’s Kardex and other equipment to Universal Credit Company, was.submitted to a jury on special questions under Court Eule No. 37, § 7 (1933).

Following the denial of the defendant’s motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial, the court entered a judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $24,009.81.

Defendant contends that plaintiff failed to prove that a contract existed between himself and Eemington Eand, Inc.; that he did not secure the orders for the purchase of the merchandise in…