Legal Opinion
People v. Omacht
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1950No. Docket 66, Calendar 42,920PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
2DissentBtjshnell, J.
Rehearings were granted in this and the related cases because of the statutory requirement. CL 1948, § 601.5 (Stat Ann § 27.25) reads in part:
“Whenever there shall be filed a dissenting opinion in a case heard by a quorum of 5 justices only, the parties therein shall have a right to a rehearing before the entire bench upon making a proper application therefor.”
The writer of this opinion adheres to the views he expressed in his former opinion. See People v. Omacht, 326 Mich 505. The majority of the Court, however, was of the opinion that no prejudicial error was committed by the…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- People v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. KolowichMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- People v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969