Legal Opinion

People v. Roder

California Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1983No. Crim. 22442PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, J.

After a jury trial, defendant Robert Earl Roder was convicted of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496) and of possession of more than one ounce of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11357, subd. (c)). On appeal he raises a single issue, contending that in light of the United States Supreme Court decisions in Ulster County Court v. Allen (1979) 442 U.S. 140 [60 L.Ed.2d 777, 99 S.Ct. 2213] and Sandstrom v. Montana (1979) 442 U.S. 510 [61 L.Ed.2d 39, 99 S.Ct. 2450], the trial court committed constitutional error in instructing the jury on the statutory presumption of guilty…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API