People v. Roder
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, J.
After a jury trial, defendant Robert Earl Roder was convicted of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496) and of possession of more than one ounce of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11357, subd. (c)). On appeal he raises a single issue, contending that in light of the United States Supreme Court decisions in Ulster County Court v. Allen (1979) 442 U.S. 140 [60 L.Ed.2d 777, 99 S.Ct. 2213] and Sandstrom v. Montana (1979) 442 U.S. 510 [61 L.Ed.2d 39, 99 S.Ct. 2450], the trial court committed constitutional error in instructing the jury on the statutory presumption of guilty…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.