Legal Opinion
Multi-Tech, Inc. v. Components, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 20, 1989No. Civ. A. 87-418 JRRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, District Judge.
On August 5, 1988, following briefing and oral argument, we granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement of Multi-Tech’s U.S. Patent No. 3,775,527 (the “ ’527 patent”). Final Judgment was entered on September 13, 1988, dismissing the plaintiff’s claims with prejudice. Two motions are presently before the Court. The first motion is Components’s motion, made pursuant to 35 U.S. C. section 285 and Local Rule 6.3, for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in defense of this action. The plaintiff filed the second motion for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Reactive Metals and Alloys Corporation v. Esm, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Builders Concrete, Inc. v. Bremerton Concrete Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- MacHinery Corporation of America v. Gullfiber Ab, Gullfiber International and Marvin SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Biacore, AB v. Thermo Bioanalysis Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AGDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Molins PLC v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- Microstrategy Inc. v. Crystal Decisions, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Pfizer Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.