Legal Opinion
Molins PLC v. Textron, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 24, 1992No. Civ. A. Nos. 86-446-JJF, 87-275-JJF and 87-163-JJFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARNAN, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
This action was filed by Molins PLC (“Molins”) and John Coventry Smith, Jr. (“Smith”) alleging infringement of Plaintiffs’ related patents, United States Patent Nos. 4,369,563 (’563 patent) and 4,621,410 (’410 patent), against three sets of defendants. The first set of defendants is comprised of Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco Corporation. The second defendant is Cincinnati Milacron, Inc., and the last group of defendants are collectively known as the West German defendants.1
As a result of motions to intervene,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory, Co. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Baxter International Inc. v. McGaw, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995