Legal Opinion

State v. Tibor

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2007No. 20060274PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Art Tibor appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of gross sexual imposition. Tibor argues the district court abused its discretion in allowing expert testimony, allowing the expert witness to vouch for the victim’s credibility, and allowing cumulative and hearsay testimony. Tibor also argues there is insufficient evidence to sustain his convictions. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On December 9, 2005, Jane Doe, an eleven-year-old girl, gave her school counselor a note telling the counselor something had been happening at her house since she was in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony Damian AzureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. State v. SilveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. United States v. Willard Dean KirkieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. State v. NoorlunNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. FedericoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GibbsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State of New Hampshire v. Dennis SullowaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  3. State v. GuttormsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Johnson v. WSINorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Koropatnicki v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API