State v. Guttormson

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Chad Guttormson appeals a district court judgment after a jury found him guilty of refusal to submit to an onsite screening test.1 He argues- his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation was violated because the arresting officer did not testify at trial and was not subject to cross-examination, and another officer was allowed to testify regarding the arresting officer’s actions. Additionally, Guttormson argues there was insufficient evidence from which the jury could infer the arresting officer formed an opinion that Gut-tormson had committed a traffic violation or…