Legal Opinion

Hart v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 23, 2015No. 372A14PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*126MARTIN, Chief Justice.

When assessing a challenge to the constitutionality of legislation, this Court’s duty is to determine whether the General Assembly has complied with the constitution. If constitutional requirements are met, the wisdom of the legislation is a question for the General Assembly. E.g., In re Hous. Bonds, 307 N.C. 52, 57, 296 S.E.2d 281, 284 (1982). In performing our task, we begin with a presumption that the laws duly enacted by the General Assembly are valid. Baker v. Martin, 330 N.C. 331, 334, 410 S.E.2d 887, 889 (1991). North Carolina courts have the authority and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Craig Ex Rel. Craig v. New Hanover County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCrory v. BergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Bonnie Peltier v. Charter Day School, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  3. Cooper v. BergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Cooper v. BergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  5. N.C. State Bd. of Educ. v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API