Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Bottomly

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1991No. 91-012PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

Gene Bottomly and Van Bottomly appeal from an order of partial summary judgment granted by the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, in favor of plaintiff Continental Insurance Company. The District Court held that neither of the defendants were “residents of the household” of the named insured Richard Bottomly within the meaning of Continental Insurance Company Preferred Farmowner’s policy.

We reverse.

The issues on appeal are:

1) Whether the District Court erred in granting partial summary judgment to Continental Insurance Company (Continental) which in effect…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Home Insurance Company v. Pinski Brothers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. ThompsonMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Reeder v. ReederNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wendell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. JoergSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. American National Fire Insurance Co. v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Lee v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Estate of David Schwenke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API