Legal Opinion

Estate of David Schwenke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1995No. 93-36156Published

1Opinion of the Court

48 F.3d 1227

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

ESTATE OF David SCHWENKE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-36156.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Jan. 12, 1995.

Decided Feb. 27, 1995.

1

Before: WRIGHT and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and GONZALEZ,* District Judge.

2

MEMORANDUM**

3

The Estate of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Thomas P. AttsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Islamic Republic of Iran, Air Force of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. The Boeing Company and Logistics Support CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. v. BoatrightColorado Court of Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API