Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Reeder

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1984No. 83-453PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

This appears to be a case of first impression in this jurisdiction and presents the question of whether one who occupies the home of another with the owner’s permission, and who negligently causes damage to the home, may be sued by the owner’s insurance carrier under a right of subrogation after the insurance carrier has paid the owner for the damages. The trial court concluded that the cause of action did not lie. We believe that the trial court was correct, and, accordingly, we affirm.

Theodore N. Reeder and Rosalie M. Reeder, husband and wife, were the owners of a residence located in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Alaska Insurance Co. v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Rock Springs Realty, Inc. v. WaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Interholzinger v. Estate of DentNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Monterey Corporation v. Hart, Ex'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  5. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Auto Spring Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Neubauer v. HostetterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  3. Tri-Par Investments, L.L.C. v. SousaNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Tate v. Trialco Scrap, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
  5. Edward E. v. ClaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API