Legal Opinion
Stoddard Brothers v. Howard
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 4, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
The plaintiffs are co-partners. They seek to recover from defendant the amount • of a promissory note, the material parts of which are in the following language:
“$160.00. Chester, Vt., Sept. 25, 1922.
120 days from date, without grace, we jointly and severally promise to pay the National Bank of Chester, or order, at their banking house, One Hundred and Sixty Dollars, value received.
No. 58939 Walter Hebert
P. 0. Address. Harry E. Howard
Indorsements:
Price A. Stoddard Stoddard Brothers Without recourse National Bank of Chester P. E. Heald, Cashier.”
The defendant by way of answer denied that he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harponola Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Bradley v. BlandinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Moore v. DukeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
- Alexander v. ChevalierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- State v. CraySupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Watterlund v. BillingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
- In Re the Estate of DelliganSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- Land Finance Corp. v. Sherwin Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Merrihew's Admr. v. GoodspeedSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Barber v. LaFromboiseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.