Watterlund v. Billings
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, C. J.
This is an action in tort to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the acts of the defendants’ employees. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff and the cause is here on the defendants’ exceptions.
The first of these concerns the denial of a motion for a directed verdict, made upon the grounds that the evidence failed to show actionable negligence on the part of either or both of the defendants, that it conclusively appeared that the plaintiff was eontributorily negligent, and that she assumed the risk of injury.
Taking the evidence in the most favorable light…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Howard National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Dent v. Bellows Falls & Saxtons River Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1922
- Gover v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1922
- Tinney v. CrosbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- In Re the Estate of DelliganSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Landrum v. RoddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Demag v. Better Power Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Thomas v. Holliday by and Through HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Huestis v. Estate of LaphamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.