Legal Opinion

Warwick v. Corbett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1919No. 15078PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Columbia county, Miller, J., entered May 10, 1918, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for damages for deceit in an exchange of properties, after a trial on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

The respondents were the owners of a ranch, and the appellants were the owners of certain mill property, both situated in Columbia county, this state. On April 1,1915, the parties hereto entered into *555an agreement, the material parts of which are as follows:

‘ ‘ Know All Men hy These Presents: That Judson A. Corbett and wife Jane Corbett and Laura B. Corbett, a widow, have agreed to sell to W. Gr. Warwick and wife Martha Warwick (all of Columbia county, Washington) the Huntsville mill property and water rights and equipment used in connection therewith, for the consideration of twenty thousand…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christensen v. KochWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Eyers v. Burbank Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Parkhurst v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Sowles v. FleetwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keylon v. InchWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Marion v. Grand Coulee Dam HotelWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Jammie v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Frahm v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Ryckman v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API