Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. Pierce

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1960No. Civ. 6028PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

This appeal involves the propriety of an order sustaining a demurrer to plaintiffs’ amended complaint without leave to amend. It is alleged therein that pla.int.iffRappellants were minors; that their mother and father were killed on January 7, 1957, as the result of the negligence of defendants-respondents; that defendant Pierce was a police officer of Porterville and defendant Kendrick was its chief of police; that about 7 p.m. on said day, Pierce was on duty as such officer; that he did then observe, accost and interrogate one Gfeller who was then intoxicated and incapable of safely driving…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. McEvoy v. American Pool Corp.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Fleckner v. DionneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Massengill v. Yuma CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Robertson v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. Sherrill v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. Hartzler v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API