Legal Opinion
Massengill v. Yuma County
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1969No. 9627-PRPublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McFarland, justice:
County of Yuma, State of Arizona; Travis Yancey, Sheriff of Yuma County; and Earl W. Keenum, petitioners in this case—hereinafter referred to as defendants ■—petitioned for and have been granted a review from a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One, which reversed an order and judgment of the Yuma County Superior Court granting the defendants1' motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. 9 Ariz.App. 281, 451 P.2d 639. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated.
This being a motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Schuster v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Steitz v. City of BeaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Leger v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Irwin v. Town of WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.