Legal Opinion
Hartzler v. City of San Jose
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1975No. Civ. 34650PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT: *
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal, following the sustaining of defendant’s demurrer without leave to amend.
The first amended complaint alleged in substance: On September 4, 1972, plaintiff’s decedent, Ruth Bunnell, telephoned the main office of the San Jose Police Department and reported that her estranged husband, Mack Bunnell, had called her, saying that he was coming to her residence to kill her. She requested immediate police aid; the department refused to come to her aid at that time, and asked that she call the department again when Mack Bunnell had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- McCorkle v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Morgan v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Connelly v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- County of Sacramento v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Morgan v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.