Buck v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Chief Judge.
After a bench trial, Jeffrey Buck was convicted of possession of cocaine. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress, arguing that the police detained him unlawfully and that his consent to search was not valid. We disagree with both arguments and affirm.
In reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress,
the evidence is construed most favorably to uphold the findings and judgment, and the trial court’s findings on disputed facts and credibility are adopted unless they are clearly erroneous. Further, since the trial court sits as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mallarino v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Benavides v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Eaves v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- In re D.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Lane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- State v. BibbinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- State v. BibbinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004