In re D.M.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Senior Judge:
After a bench trial, D.M. was convicted of second-degree burglary, 1 felony destruction of property, 2 and second-degree theft. 3 D.M. appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress a show-up identification and evidence obtained pursuant to his arrest thereafter. Specifically, he contends his seventy-five minute detention was an unconstitutional seizure because (1) the length of his detention converted a temporary investigatory stop into a de fac-to arrest, and (2) the police could have used less intrusive means to accomplish their investigation. We disagree…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- CIAN PRIDGEN v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Ellison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Hawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022