Legal Opinion

In re D.M.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 2014No. 11-FS-1125PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Senior Judge:

After a bench trial, D.M. was convicted of second-degree burglary, 1 felony destruction of property, 2 and second-degree theft. 3 D.M. appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress a show-up identification and evidence obtained pursuant to his arrest thereafter. Specifically, he contends his seventy-five minute detention was an unconstitutional seizure because (1) the length of his detention converted a temporary investigatory stop into a de fac-to arrest, and (2) the police could have used less intrusive means to accomplish their investigation. We disagree…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. CIAN PRIDGEN v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Ellison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Hawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API